Discussion about this post

User's avatar
IdeaDictionary's avatar

Very interesting! You have some really great ideas. I want these ideas to become popular. I'm not sure about the improvements to the Bussard ramjet, but I find the Caplan thruster interesting. Although the last time I read a third of the paper was a few days ago. Haha.

Expand full comment
O.H. Murphy's avatar

On 'Population Growth Targeting': you could think that encouraging a lower interest rate might increase population through impacts on housing affordability (assuming supply also rises), more employment, and reducing opportunity costs of money spent on children (which might make people delay parenting until they are older and have accumulated more wealth).

On 'Deniable communication': If you are using a set of one-time pads for encryption, then in a simple case you can just use the xor of your alternative message with the ciphertext as a second padset. For example: you would send a plaintext message M1 that is encrypted to ciphertext as C = Pad1 ^ M1. You then have your second plaintext message M2 and have C = Pad2 ^ M2 -> Pad2 = C ^ M2. You could then exchange either Pad1 or Pad2 and it would seem to match two different messages. This gets more complicated if your pads need to be generated from some function (even if you set the keys) since you would need to basically invert the generating function to find the right secret key to get Pad2 which would probably make it vulnerable to a chosen plaintext attack. You would also potentially be leaking information between the messages, but I'm not sure.

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts